pakistan, india, pakistan-india relation, india-pakistan nuclear deterrence, india and pakistan conflict, pakistan future nuclear weapons, india and pakistan nuclear weapons comparison 2022, list of pakistan nuclear weapons, india nuclear weapons, pak-india relations notes, pak india relations slideshare, pakistan military, pakistan military capabilities, pakistan military budget, indian military, india military budget, india military rank in the world, pakistan military rank in the world, india Pakistan, pakistan v india
India-Pakistan Relations: Why is there a race to build more Nuclear Weapons?
The first and last
atomic bomb was dropped on Japan about 76 years ago today. and August 6, 1945, and August 9, 1945, are the two dates that endanger the very existence of the world
from nuclear weapons.
On August 6, and
August 9, the United States detonated atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
respectively. Hiroshima and Nagasaki continue to serve as examples of how the
atomic bomb may be used to wipe out humanity. The residents of Hiroshima have
yet to heal from the ravages of the nuclear strike, despite the fact that it
has been 76 years.
Despite witnessing
this catastrophe, the nine countries of the world still have more than 13,000
nuclear weapons, each of which is capable of wreaking havoc far more than the
world at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Seen 76 years ago.
The report states
that China and Pakistan are far ahead of India in terms of nuclear weapons.
Following are some
key points in the SIPRI (SPRI) previous year report:
- At the beginning of 2021, the nine nuclear-weapon states (US, Russia, China, UK, France, Israel, Pakistan, India, and North Korea) had about 13,080 nuclear weapons, some less than that number. Spray estimated at the beginning of the year 2020.
- Of these, 3,825 nuclear weapons are said to be ready for immediate action. Last year their number was 3720.
- Of the 3,825 weapons, about 2,000 are from the United States and Russia and have been placed on high alert.
- North Korea possesses 40-50 nuclear weapons, while Israel has over 90.
- North Korea has built about ten new nuclear weapons compared to last year and currently has 40-50 nuclear weapons.
- China has built 30 new nuclear weapons compared to last year and now has about 350 nuclear weapons.
- Pakistan has built five new nuclear weapons compared to last year and now has about 165 nuclear weapons.
- India built six new nuclear weapons last year and now has about 156 nuclear weapons.
Rahul Bedi, India's
defense analyst, believes that it is not appropriate to call the increase in
the number of nuclear weapons a "race or competition".
"We must
recognize that nuclear weapons development is an ongoing process," he
said. It is not possible for a country to suddenly stop developing nuclear
weapons and resume them after a while. Once the weapons production stops, the
whole process of building weapons will have to start again. So, in my opinion, it
would not be appropriate to call it a competition.
Talk about India,
Pakistan, and China, these are the three neighboring countries and all three
have nuclear power. The situation in India, Pakistan, and China are very unique.
There are very few nuclear-armed countries in the world whose border disputes
exist almost all the time. Whether through firing or any other means. Pakistan
and China are two countries where control of nuclear weapons is primarily in
the hands of the military and the situation becomes even more dangerous for
India.
Talking about the
control of Pakistan's nuclear weapons, retired nuclear officer and former
officer of Pakistan Strategic Plans Division (SPD) Brigadier Naeem Salik
clarified that Pakistan's nuclear program is under the control of the National
Command Authority. Which is the highest decision-making body on nuclear policy.
The authority is headed by the prime minister and includes four federal
ministers in addition to four military officers. One of the members is the
chief of army staff, so there is no possibility of the military influencing
nuclear decision-making.
On the other hand,
talking about the defense and nuclear alliance between Pakistan and China, the defense analyst says that Pakistan and China have a deep military-strategic
relationship that covers all areas of military and strategic importance
according to known sources.
Excessive spending
on nuclear weapons
It is also worth
noting that while the world has been battling the deadly epidemic Covid-19 for
the past two years, on the other hand, nuclear weapons are being relentlessly
spent. The report states that in 2020, countries with nuclear capabilities
spent 72 72.6 billion dollars on nuclear weapons alone, 1.4 billion dollars more than in 2019.
Nuclear weapons: are
they for peace?
APJ Abdul Kalam, a
scientist who has been instrumental in equipping India with nuclear capability
and has been dubbed 'Missile Man of India', had said that nuclear weapons
prevent other countries from attacking us and therefore they are 'weapons of
peace'.
"Weapons of
deterrence" is a term commonly used to describe nuclear weapons. "If
we talk about India, Pakistan, and China, I don't think these countries will
ever attack each other with nuclear weapons because all three have nuclear
weapons," editor Sangeeta said. That is why, despite tensions on the
border, the situation does not escalate to nuclear attacks, and that is why
nuclear weapons are called weapons of deterrence.
Ghazala Wahab, the executive editor of the defense magazine Force, also agrees with Sangeeta. She
stated, "I do not believe India would ever be able to wage a nuclear war
with Pakistan or China." Nuclear weapons are not intended for use in
combat. Countries like the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France,
and North Korea, on the other hand, are not part of the "do not use
first" doctrine.
About the
"no-first-use" policy, Brigadier Naeem Salik (r) said that Pakistan
had made it clear that it would not take the initiative in using nuclear
weapons. No, because it is designed to compete with India's superiority over
conventional weapons. He stated, "We must keep in mind the developments in
India's conventional weapons scenario." So when India introduced the Cold
Start Doctrine, we had to add short-range missiles to our defense system.
However, I must say that ambiguity adds to the value of deterrence.
Editor Parveen Sahni
says the growing number of nuclear weapons is a cause for concern because
Western countries have not pursued a "no-use" policy. At the same
time, Parveen says there is no need to worry too much about which countries
have how many nuclear weapons.
In this regard,
defense analysts said that when the Indian Parliament was attacked in 2002,
India mobilized its troops and in response, Pakistan ordered its evil forces to
be ready. The costs of this military operation were huge and costly for the
Pakistani government. At the same time, a large part of the Pakistani evil army
was engaged in eradicating militancy in the northwestern region on the western
border. This situation forced Pakistan to include tactical nuclear weapons in
its war plan.
So is there no
threat to the world from the atomic bomb?
Even after declaring
nuclear weapons as "weapons deterrence" and "weapons of
peace", experts cannot completely rule out the dangers posed by nuclear
bombs to the world.
Over time, the
theory of deterrence has been challenged by experts. According to an article
published in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, an organization working on
global security issues, the principle of deterrence regarding nuclear weapons
has now become obsolete. Japanese leader and Hiroshima governor Heide Yakuo
Yuzaki wrote an article entitled "A Message from Hiroshima on the Reality
of Atomic Bombing." He writes that the ideology of deterrence dates back
to the Cold War when the war of ideas was raging between the United States and
the Soviet Union. According to Yuzaki: "The theory of nuclear deterrence
is based on uncertain predictions. Given today's evolving technology and
geographical and political conditions, it does not appear that the idea of nuclear deterrence completely
eliminates the possibility of a nuclear war in the future.
The report said that
tensions between India and Pakistan had reached such a level after the Pulwama
attack in February 2019 that there was no denying the possible use of nuclear
weapons if there was a major "misunderstanding" between the two
countries. According to the report's lead author and IISS Fellow Antonio
Lewis, "India and Pakistan are constantly evolving in their technologies
and capabilities. Because of this, the two countries are underestimating each
other's nuclear defenses." China's increasing might as a nuclear-armed
nation poses a security threat to India. China can definitely be a threat to
India as its military and nuclear capabilities are far superior to India's.
However, they are not more worried about this than Pakistan.
pakistan, india, pakistan-india relation, india-pakistan nuclear deterrence, india and pakistan conflict, pakistan future nuclear weapons, india and pakistan nuclear weapons comparison 2022, list of pakistan nuclear weapons, india nuclear weapons, pak-india relations notes, pak india relations slideshare, pakistan military, pakistan military capabilities, pakistan military budget, indian military, india military budget, india military rank in the world, pakistan military rank in the world, india Pakistan, pakistan v india
0 Comments